How to predict disaster

Of necessity, the usual predictions of the effects of climate change focus on predictable, gradual changes. Put so much CO2 into the atmosphere, and you can expect an average global rise in temperature of such-and-such.

However, in addition to this kind of change, there is also discontinuous, stepwise change. Through an unfortunate coincidence, several processes converge, and a system is unable to cope.

There is a standard statistical technique for predicting the outcome of such events, called a Markov process [PDF file]. A subset of these have an “absorbing state.”

Suppose a drunken man is staggering home along a mountain path. You know the kind: a near-vertical wall rises on his left, a sheer drop waits for him on the right. Each step takes him forward, but also some steps move him a certain distance to one side or another. So, regardless of where he’s been, his next location is completely determined by where he is now, and the next step he takes. That’s the essence of a Markov process.

The sideways distance randomly varies in size and direction. He may safely get home. Or, he may be in a position of having three or four steps taking him to the very edge. If now his next step is slightly to the right, over he goes. That’s the absorbing state.

By measuring the sideways variation of his past few hundred steps, we can estimate the probability that, some time or another, he will plummet.

This is the kind of logic used by insurance companies to assess risk. It is the logic we can use to assess the probability that a combination of events may take humanity into the absorbing state of total collapse.

I don’t have the resources to collect relevant data and do the calculations, but I hope a reader with a university affiliation and project-hungry research students might. All I can say is that this way of looking at environmental degradation is just as necessary as the projection of more or less continuous trends.

Recent research has showed that quite a number of very serious potential global disasters are possible absorbing states for a Markov process. An example is the danger of the West Antarctic Ice Shelf starting to break up.

PS Guess what. Recent evidence is that the breakup of the West Antarctic Ice Shelf has started, and it is now irreversibly disintegrating.

Fascinating account of the history of glaciology.
iceshelf

Advertisements

5 Responses to How to predict disaster

  1. pendantry says:

    Typo alert:
    “… insurance companies to assesassess risk.”

    Hmm… on second thoughts: maybe you got it right first time…

    Like

    • Dr Bob Rich says:

      Thank you! I am also an obsessive editor, but this shows no one is perfect.
      🙂
      Bob

      Liked by 1 person

      • pendantry says:

        Back again, a year later, for another read…

        What you call ‘absorbing states’ I understand as ‘tipping points’. And on the subject of the West Antarctic ice sheet, I remember seeing, some time ago, video illustration of how the ‘grounding line’ of the ice sheet is held back by ridges of higher ground… and the last such large ridge has already been passed, leaving nothing to prevent complete collapse of the entire ice sheet. Unfortunately, I can’t find that video; the best I can offer is this NASA clip:

        What nobody knows is how fast all this will happen. Estimates vary wildly. All that’s known for certain at this point is that the ice is retreating far more quickly than any of the models can simulate.

        Here’s another video, entitled ‘What History Reveals about Sea Level Rise’:

        Am I wrong to predict disaster? I don’t think so.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Dr Bob Rich says:

    Every evidence-based prediction so far has soon been proven to be grossly optimistic. I think this is because you can’t model the full complexity of interactions of various global processes. For example, what is the effect of the faster-than-predicted melting in Greenland on the Antarctic, and vice versa?
    When I recalled my past lives, I was told that my reason for being on earth was to witness the ending of humanity — or to be instrumental in saving us. I’ve fictionalised this in “Ascending Spiral,” but actually had that experience.
    I think the second part may well be wishful thinking. However, it actually doesn’t matter. All things alive die, sooner or later. It doesn’t matter if we do this one at a time, or all together. It devastates me to think of little children dying — but again, the sane view is that it doesn’t matter, because they’ll have a new life, elsewhere. All that matters is that we should move toward the Ultimate Lesson.
    At least, this is what my friend Bill Sutcliffe says. He is the hero of my Doom Healer series.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s