A first for Scientific American: endorsing a political candidate.

“We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history — until now”

This editorial from one of the world’s most respected journals is worth reading.

Regardless of other matters that may influence your vote, and whether you choose to vote at all, please listen to the voice of REASON.

About Dr Bob Rich

I am a professional grandfather. My main motivation is to transform society to create a sustainable world in which my grandchildren and their grandchildren in perpetuity can have a life, and a life worth living. This means reversing environmental idiocy that's now threatening us with extinction, and replacing culture of greed and conflict with one of compassion and cooperation.
This entry was posted in Climate change, environment, Health, politics. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to A first for Scientific American: endorsing a political candidate.

  1. pendantry says:

    Reblogged this on Wibble and commented:
    These are very, very strange times.

    Although Trump and his allies have tried to create obstacles that prevent people from casting ballots safely in November, either by mail or in person, it is crucial that we surmount them and vote. It’s time to move Trump out and elect Biden, who has a record of following the data and being guided by science.


    • daryan12 says:

      The scary thing is, Biden is a fairly mediocre candidate (I call him Mr Vanilla), one who ain’t going to do anything great, but ain’t going to do anything stupid. And its him v’s Pvt Bonespurs the thief in chief. Yet Biden is only about 8% ahead (so a swing of 4%, or a bit of mail fraud & voter intimidation could still see Trump win). Its should be something like an 80/20 split.

      I think its more worrying that its gotten to the stage where SA have had to take a position on who should be president.

      Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.